USPTO serial 77603058
EPAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4239600Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2012
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EPAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dieppe, CA
Dieppe, CA
Dieppe, CA
IRVING CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED
SAINT JOHN, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
ANDREW S. EHARD MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Bathroom tissue, paper towel | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Irving Tissue Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Irving Tissue Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Irving Tissue Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by IRVING CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named EPAK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 2, 2012 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |