Drawing for QUANTUMID

USPTO serial 77603346

QUANTUMID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLOWERS, JAY K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUANTUMID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen A. Pasulka

Kathleen A. Pasulka Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for authentication of users on a computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 6, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 29, 2010TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jan 29, 2010OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 20, 2010RGTRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB REQUEST—
Oct 23, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 23, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 23, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 23, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 18, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 17, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 18, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 3, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance