USPTO serial 77603647
EUROLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EUROLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sun Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eileen Keusseyan
EILEEN KEUSSEYAN LAW OFFICES OF EILEEN KEUSSEYAN21300 VICTORY BLVD STE 660WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367-2579UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | General purpose plastic bags; Merchandise bags; Paper bags and sacks; Paper bags for packaging; Paper gift bags; Paper shopping bags; Plastic bags for packaging; Plastic bags for packing; Plastic or paper bags for merchandise packaging; Plastic shopping bags | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |