USPTO serial 77603846
PREDICTIVE FLOW CONTROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PREDICTIVE FLOW CONTROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary S. Mathew
MARY S. MATHEW THELEN LLP875 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6225UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity, namely, amplifier, antennas, transformers, electrical circuit boards, inte-grated circuits, and processor boards for mobile and non-mobile systems; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, namely, digital cameras, mobile phones, mobile data receivers, computer hardware systems, and optical data carriers, pre-recorded magnetic data carriers in the field of software for mobile networks, mobile phones, network access control, and for accessing a global computer network, video recorders, and audio recorders; data processing equipment, namely, processors, digital signal processors, telecommunications hardware, namely gateways, switches and hubs for computer networks, quality of service analyzer for networks comprising embedded software designed to monitor and improve the quality and/or the speed of the transmitted voice or sound signals, firewalls for networks, load balancer for networks, and computers; computer programs and software for mobile networks, mobile phones, network access control, and for accessing a global computer network; components of digital networks, namely, antenna, switches for networks, hubs for networks, telecommunications hardware, namely, gate-ways for networks, computer hardware for billing operations in mobile networks, quality of service analyzer comprising embedded software designed to monitor and improve the quality and/or the speed of the transmitted voice or sound signals, and firewall security software | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, providing mobile networks and quality of service in networks by monitoring and improving the quality and/or the speed of the transmitted voice or sound signal, and cellular telephone services, providing fiber optic network services, transmission of voice, data, images, audio, video and information via telephone, television, or global communication networks; personal communication services; pager services; providing multiple-user access to a global communications network; and transmission and broadcast of audio and video programming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |