USPTO serial 77604365
PANDORA'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PANDORA'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
SCOTT W JOHNSTON MERCHANT & GOULD PC80 SOUTH EIGHTH STREETSUITE 3200MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2215Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | (Based on Intent to Use and Based on 44(e)) Cosmetics, namely, lipsticks, eye pencils, lip pencils, eye shadow, mascara, lip gloss, blush, pressed and loose powder, cosmetic foundations, cover sticks and nail polish; (Based on Intent to Use) Cosmetic boxes sold containing cosmetics | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | (Based on Intent to Use) Retail store services, online retail store services, and mail order catalog services featuring cosmetics, cosmetic implements and cosmetic boxes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |