Drawing for SEARS BLUE CLIMATE CREW

USPTO serial 77604446

SEARS BLUE CLIMATE CREW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEARS BLUE CLIMATE CREW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald Spuhler

Ronald Spuhler McAndrews Held & Malloy Ltd500 W Madison St34th FlChicago, IL 60661

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Home energy assessment services featuring analysis of home furnaces, windows, insulation, heating and air conditioning and other energy systems for the purpose of determining home improvements needed to improve energy use and efficiencyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 24, 2012TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Aug 24, 2012OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 3, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 6, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance