Drawing for HYPERBD

USPTO serial 77604530

HYPERBD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCRAY, RENEE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYPERBD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet R. Kleinberg

JANET R. KLEINBERG GEORGE GRELLAS & ASSOCIATES20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STE 280CUPERTINO, CA 95014-2298UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Consumers electronic products, namely, stationary and portable televisions, television set top boxes, blank recordable digital versatile discs and digital versatile discs featuring movies and games; optical disc format players; digital televisions; remote control devices for radios, televisions, stereos, optical disc format players, digital versatile disc players and recorders; portable car navigation computers; entertainment systems for automobiles, home, boat and recreational vehicle use consisting of navigation systems, car digital versatile disc players and digital radios; handheld consumer electronic products, namely, personal navigation devices, portable media players, mobile televisions, cellular telephones, portable digital versatile disc and optical disc format players; personal computers, namely, notebooks and laptops and mobile equipment, namely, mobile telephones, personal digital assistants, portable media players both digital versatile disc and optic disc format and ultra-mobile computersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 20, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 5, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 5, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 7, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 3, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance