USPTO serial 77604872
TELENOSTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TELENOSTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc.
Nashua, NH
Other trademarks owned by BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc.
BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc.
Nashua, NH
Other trademarks owned by BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel J. Long
DANIEL J. LONG BAE SYSTEMSPO BOX 868NASHUA, NH 03061-0868UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for use by others in the performance of industrial and business equipment, business asset, and vehicle fleet management services, for use in supply chain management, and for use in the performance of modeling and simulation services involving the automated location and identification of industrial and business equipment, business assets, and vehicle fleets; diagnostic and prognostic modeling, monitoring, and predictive software, namely, software for use in persistently incorporating real time usage and performance data, namely, operating environment, and operational parameters into the simulation and statistical predictive models to increase the accuracy of those predictions for use in vehicles, business equipment, and business assets, including freight cargo containers; integrated data environment software, namely, software that is used for polling installed hardware products which collect and report on vehicle or asset operating parameters like engine speed and oil temperature along with fault and diagnostics codes, software used for modeling vehicle or asset behavior, software for predicting future performance based on collected data and simulations, performance modeling software used to model fleet or asset total operating costs and recommended changes, and software used to provide end users with a single point of information presentation; model based performance software, namely, performance software used to define the total operational cost of fleet or asset group and projected total operating costs based on changes recommended through analysis of all operational parameters, simulation, and predictive modeling; and performance based logistics business case analysis software, namely, software used to redefine supply chain supply and demand operational parameters, redefine fleet or asset preventative maintenance schedules, and software to provide fleet or asset managers with dynamic information to optimize in use repair times | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Equipment, asset and vehicle fleet management services, namely, business management and planning and preparing business reports regarding the end of product life span of industrial and commercial equipment, business assets and vehicle fleets; supply chain management services; and modeling and simulation analysis services, namely, business management consulting with relation to strategy, marketing, sales, operations, and product design particularly specializing in the use of analytic and statistic models for the understanding and predicting of market trends and actions, and performance based contract services where agreed to reductions in fleet or asset group maintenance costs are reduced by a fixed percent | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named TELENOSTICS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |