Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77605261?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77605261. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns THE ORIGINAL CRESCENT CITY STEAKS SINCE 1934?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77605261, the listed owner(s) include: Crescent City Restaurant Inc.

What is USPTO serial number 77605261?

Serial number 77605261 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark THE ORIGINAL CRESCENT CITY STEAKS SINCE 1934. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of THE ORIGINAL CRESCENT CITY STEAKS SINCE 1934?

THE ORIGINAL CRESCENT CITY STEAKS SINCE 1934 (77605261) currently shows USPTO status code 614 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover THE ORIGINAL CRESCENT CITY STEAKS SINCE 1934?

The public record lists International Classes: 030. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: THE ORIGINAL CRESCENT CITY STEAKS SINCE 1934 Serial# 77605261 | status 614; last event PETD | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ORIGINAL CRESCENT CITY STEAKS SINCE 1934?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Crescent City Restaurant Inc
New Orleans, LA
Other trademarks owned by Crescent City Restaurant Inc

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
030	Salad dressing	ACTIVE	Sep 20, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 19, 2010	PETD	PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED	—
Mar 5, 2010	PINM	INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED	—
Mar 2, 2010	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
Feb 8, 2010	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Dec 28, 2009	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 28, 2009	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 1, 2009	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2009	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 10, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 10, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2008	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Nov 12, 2008	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Nov 5, 2008	MDSC	NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED	—
Nov 4, 2008	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—

THE ORIGINAL CRESCENT CITY STEAKS SINCE 1934