Drawing for SILICONBLADE

USPTO serial 77605516

SILICONBLADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILICONBLADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brittany Estell

Brittany Estell Western Digital Technologies, Inc5601 Great Oaks ParkwaySan Jose, CA 95119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, hardware and digital storage mediaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 14, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 14, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 13, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 5, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance