Drawing for DEPLOY

USPTO serial 77606071

DEPLOY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEPLOY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Miller

Mark D. Miller Sierra IP Law, PCPO Box 5637Fresno, CA 93755UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Agricultural adjuvants, namely, dispersing agents used with soil applied pesticidesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 20, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 14, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 14, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 16, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 16, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 18, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 18, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 9, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 9, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 7, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 5, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 4, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 4, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 4, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 4, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 4, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 10, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 6, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance