Drawing for FUSIBLE TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 77606148

FUSIBLE TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEETE, KYLE C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUSIBLE TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine T. Dobrowitsky

Catherine T. Dobrowitsky Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C.150 West JeffersonSuite 2500Detroit, MI 48226

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Thermally sensitive actuators for fire protection equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 17, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 16, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance