Drawing for K D KENTUCKY DERBY PARTY

USPTO serial 77606383

K D KENTUCKY DERBY PARTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with K D KENTUCKY DERBY PARTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy B. Berge

AMY B. BERGE GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC101 SOUTH FIFTH STREET3500 NATIONAL CITY TOWERLOUISVILLE, KY 40202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Belts; Caps; Cloth bibs; Coats; Footwear; Gloves; Hats; Jackets; Neckwear; Nightwear; Pants; Rainwear; Scarves; Shirts; Sweaters; T-shirtsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 27, 2008CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 24, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2008GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2008CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Dec 24, 2008AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 24, 2008PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance