USPTO serial 77606709
NEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arne I. Fors
ARNE I. FORS GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP100 KING ST WSUITE 1600, 1 FIRST CANADIAN PLACETORONTO; ONTARIO, M5X1G5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Personal digital assistants and mobile data terminals having radio frequency receivers and transmitters for end-to-end mobile systems for controllers and data processors, wireless local area network equipment, namely, access points, controllers and mini-controllers for fixed and portable radio frequency identifiers and antennas; and fixed and portable radio frequency identification readers; integrated voice and data enabled wide area wireless radio; handheld and integrated laser scanners, linear and area imagers and digital cameras; network management software and hardware for the management and monitoring of personal digital assistants and terminals; all for use with rugged handheld personal digital assistants and terminals, electronic personal organizers, Radio Frequency Identification(RFID) readers, cellular phone devices, VoIP communication devices, speech-directed devices and speech recognition, payments devices, secure identification and control devices, and for use with associated accessories used for transmitting, receiving, viewing, updating and managing data, inventory and material handling, storage and retrieval, shipping and receiving, ordering, picking and cycle counting of merchandise, asset management and tracking, mobile customer relationship management, mobile ticketing, payment processing, personal identification collection and verification, dispatching and scheduling, general data collection, equipment maintenance, break-fix and repair and GPS-driven mapping and direction finding | ACTIVE | Aug 27, 2008 |
| 042 | Consulting and designing for others of data transmission, reception and management systems and material handling systems, conducting engineering surveys, namely, installation and site surveys, consulting, design and integration services in the field of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), consultation and design services and associated services, namely, programming of RFID readers in the field of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) systems used for transmitting, receiving, viewing, updating and managing data, inventory and material handling, storage and retrieval, shipping and receiving, ordering, picking and cycle counting of merchandise, asset management and tracking, mobile customer relationship management, mobile ticketing, payment processing, personal identification collection and verification, dispatching and scheduling, general data collection, equipment maintenance, break-fix and repair, GPS-driven mapping and direction finding | ACTIVE | Aug 27, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2013 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 1, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |