Drawing for RMS REPLY MESSAGE SERVICE

USPTO serial 77606718

RMS REPLY MESSAGE SERVICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RMS REPLY MESSAGE SERVICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald N. Huff

DONALD N. HUFF DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC1300 I ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING RELATING TO COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE THAT PROVIDE ELECTRONIC DATA AND RELATED MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS BY MOBILE NETWORKS, ELECTRONIC MANAGEMENT OF STORAGE SPACEACTIVE—
038ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MAIL AND MESSAGES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING OF ELECTRONIC MAIL AND RELATED MEDIA AND DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, NAMELY, SMS COMMUNICATIONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 29, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 28, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 21, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 26, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance