USPTO serial 77606766
FLSMIDTH MINERALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLSMIDTH MINERALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey R. Halpern
STACEY R. HALPERN KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | accessories, namely, metal pipeline fittings, metal baffle plates; metal slides, for use in the cement manufacturing industry, mining, mineral processing, food, pharmaceutical, chemical and power industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Mineral dressing apparatus and machines, namely, crushing machines, screening equipment, equipment for feeding and crushing, namely, feeder-breakers, gyratory crushers, cone crushers, roll crushers, jaw crushers, hammermills, vertical shaft impactors, mobile crushing stations; semi-autogenous mills and ball grinders machines, namely, SAG mills and ball mills; wet separation machines, namely, hydrocyclones, classifiers, monosizers, hydosizers, DSM screens, bowl desiltors; flotation machines, namely, flotation cells, attrition cells, flash flotation cells, froth flotation machines; hoists for mining; machine parts, namely, bearings; fluid bed drying machines, namely, fluid bed dryers, fluid bed, limestone calcination machines, limestone preheaters; conveyance systems and machines for materials, namely, machines for mining and cement manufacture, namely, conveyor belts for horizontal conveyance, fixed and mobile conveyor belts, elevators for conveyance of raw materials; helical conveyors and pressure conveyors, cranes, namely, cranes for loading and unloading of ships, mechanical and pneumatic conveyors, pendulum conveyors; chain conveyors, feed belt conveyors and tray conveyors; structural parts and fittings for the above goods; accessories for the above goods, namely, bucket conveyors, hydraulic pumps, fans for machine engines; bucket conveyors, hydraulic pumps, fans for machine engines | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Apparatus and equipment for heating, namely, rotary kilns and drying kilns; gas suspension calcinators, namely, machines for separation and neutralisation of gases; heating apparatus in the form of calcination and annealing, namely, limestone calcination machines; preheater machines, namely, limestone preheater machines, anode furnaces, holding furnaces and melting furnaces for industrial use; cooling apparatus, namely, tube coolers, contact coolers, fluid bed coolers; industrial cooling apparatus, namely, compax coolers; structural parts and fittings for the above goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Land vehicles for transportation by the mineral industry, namely, tipper vehicles with release mechanisms, hopper-cars, mine cars, tipper wagons, tripper cars; structural parts and fittings for the above goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Building, installation, maintenance and repair of mineral dressing installations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering services in the field of mining, metallurgical and mineral processing engineering, design engineering, hydrocarbon processing, hazardous incineration; testing and inspection of mineral dressing installations for quality control | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FLSmidth A/S
- Other trademarks owned by FLSmidth A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FLSMIDTH MINERALS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 28, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 14, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |