Drawing for SPECIALTYFOOD.COM THE INNOVATIVE HUB OF THE SPECIALTY FOOD MARKET

USPTO serial 77606872

SPECIALTYFOOD.COM THE INNOVATIVE HUB OF THE SPECIALTY FOOD MARKET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPECIALTYFOOD.COM THE INNOVATIVE HUB OF THE SPECIALTY FOOD MARKET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Doreen L. Costa

Doreen L. Costa Baker Botts LLP30 Rockefeller Plaza, 44th FloorNew York, NY 10112-4498UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of magazines in the field of specialty food for the food industryACTIVE—
016Magazine containing information of interest to the gourmet food industryACTIVE—
035Business information services, namely, compilation and provision of a wide range of information concerning the food trade, trade shows, trade show exhibitions and trade show exhibitors and their products and services; providing commercial business and commercial information via the Internet about a wide range of topics concerning the food industry, namely, information concerning the food trade, trade shows, trade show exhibitions and trade show exhibitors and their products and services, specialty food stores, business trends, marketing trends, online business directories featuring a searchable listing of food manufacturers, importers, distributors, agents, brokers, and publishers, with links to the retail online web sites of others that can be used to assist with finding products of others for purchase, and related business information for commercial and purchasing purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 18, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 13, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 28, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 28, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 23, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 8, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 19, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 6, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 30, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 28, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2008MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance