USPTO serial 77607309
SWANSKI AND HUTCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SWANSKI AND HUTCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FORTITUDE VALLEY, AU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design, development, analysis, implementation and security for computer software, computer middleware, computer firmware, computer programs, multi-media programs, computer systems, computer networks, peripherals, secure computer software and systems; installation, modification, updating and repair of computer software, computer middleware, computer firmware, computer programs, multi-media programs, computer systems, computer networks, peripherals, secure computer software and systems; computer support services; web portal services; web hosting services; hosting the digital, audio and video content of websites for others; design, development and maintenance of websites for others; commissioned writing for websites, computer programs and computer software; graphic design; computer aided graphic design; on-line provision of web-based software and applications; design, development and maintenance of computers and computer hardware; computer network services; computer security services (programming and software installation repair and maintenance services); computer firewall services; advisory and consultancy services in relation to computers, computer hardware, computer software, computer middleware, computer firmware, computer programs, multi-media programs, computer systems, computer networks, peripherals, secure computer software and systems; advisory and consultancy services in relation to computer security; data conversion of computer programs and data; recovery of computer data including disaster data recovery; design, development and hosting of databases; accreditation and certification for quality or standards; research relating to computers and technology; conducting of feasibility studies; providing information, including by electronic means and via a global computer network, about all of the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |