USPTO serial 77607752
FSX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FSX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minato-ku, Tokyo, JP
Minato-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles M. Marmelstein
CHARLES M. MARMELSTEIN ARENT FOX LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5369UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Internal combustion engines for land vehicles, namely, Internal combustion engines for automobiles, for all terrain vehicles, for recreational vehicles, in the nature of campers, travel trailers, and fifth wheels, for motor trucks, for motorcycles, for motor scooters, for mopeds and for motor tricycles; land vehicles, namely, automobiles, all terrain vehicles, recreational vehicles, in the nature of campers, travel trailers, and fifth wheels, motor trucks, motorcycles, motor scooters, mopeds, motor tricycles; water vehicles, namely, ships, boats, motor boats, yachts, launches, power boats, personal jet boats, seaplanes, and amphibious airplanes; air cushion vehicles; funicular railcars; space vehicles; air vehicles, namely, air balloons, aircraft, aero planes, airships, dirigible balloons; and structural parts for all of the aforementioned goods, excluding street cleaning vehicles or street cleaning machines, and parts used in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 15, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |