Drawing for Serial No. 77607761

USPTO serial 77607761

Serial No. 77607761

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 77607761?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rafi Ourfalian, Esq.

BENJAMIN AYDINDZHYAN OURFALIAN & OURFALIAN700 N BRAND BLVDSUITE 1150GLENDALE, CA 91203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, jeans, pants, skirts, T-Shirts; causual wear namely pants, and short pantsACTIVEMay 28, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 9, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 9, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 6, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 22, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 13, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 16, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 30, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 30, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 30, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 30, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 9, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 16, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 22, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 11, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 10, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance