Drawing for EVERYDAY BY SIMPLICITY

USPTO serial 77607765

EVERYDAY BY SIMPLICITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FARRELL, ANNE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERYDAY BY SIMPLICITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark B. Harrison

MARK B. HARRISON VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1607UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, toothpaste, deodorant for personal use, facial cleansers, skin care moisturizers, skin and body lotions, bubble bath, perfume, skin and body powders, face and body scrubs; hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, mousses, gels, hair sprays, hair serums, hair gloss, hair detangelers, thickening lotions, relaxers, hair color, finishing creams and styling lotions; hair tints and coloring and hair restoration lotions; baby wipes; disposable wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds for personal hygiene; non-medicated lip balm, scented body sprays and body sprays used as a fragrance and as a personal deodorant; skin bronzers, skin lighteners; hand and body soap; body wash; full line of non-medicated personal body and hair care productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 15, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 19, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 29, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 27, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 27, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 27, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 7, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 2008AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 12, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance