USPTO serial 77607814
PAIOLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4184646Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 7, 2012
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PAIOLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Malaysian Agrifood Corporation Berhad
Jalan Stesen Sentral 5, MY
Other trademarks owned by Malaysian Agrifood Corporation Berhad
Malaysian Agrifood Corporation Berhad
Jalan Stesen Sentral 5, MY
Other trademarks owned by Malaysian Agrifood Corporation Berhad
Malaysian Agrifood Corporation Berhad
Jalan Stesen Sentral 5, MY
Other trademarks owned by Malaysian Agrifood Corporation Berhad
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth A. Linford
ELIZABETH A. LINFORD LADAS & PARRY LLP5670 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90036-5606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials, namely, carton boxes, cardboard boxes, cardboard liners, cardboard dividers, cardboard nesting boxes; printed matter, namely, printed forms, printed certificates; pamphlets in the field of agriculture, marketing, sales, promotions; paper labels comprised of paper and food-safe plastic materials, namely, polypropylene and polyethylene; printed advertising boards of paper or cardboards; bags of paper and plastic bags for packaging; paper envelopes and pouches for packaging; packaging material made of starch-based materials in the nature of paper substitute for consumer products; plastic materials for packaging food and beverages, namely, food-safe plastic materials comprised of oriented polypropylene and low density polypropylene; printed products for packaging purposes, namely, food-safe kraft liner corrugated carton with outer-liner food-safe wax; stationery; stickers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Preserved, dried, and cooked fruits; crystallized fruits; frosted and frozen fruits; fruit salads; fruit jellies; canned fruits; fruit-based snack food; fruit peel; fruit pulp; jams, jellies, compotes; marmalade | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Agricultural products and grains, namely, unprocessed grain, unprocessed seeds, unprocessed plant seedlings, unprocessed leaves, unprocessed stems and unprocessed roots, all for agricultural use; fresh agricultural grains for planting, fresh fruits | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Fruit drinks; fruit juices; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; fruit nectars; concentrates for making soft drinks; preparations in the nature of syrups, extracts, essence for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks; powder-based fruit drinks; carbonated fruit drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Malaysian Agrifood Corporation Berhad
- Other trademarks owned by Malaysian Agrifood Corporation Berhad
- Other trademarks owned by Malaysian Agrifood Corporation Berhad
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named PAIOLA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 22, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |