Drawing for FLYING TIGRESS

USPTO serial 77607981

FLYING TIGRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLYING TIGRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica B. Richman

Monica B. Richman Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLPWacker Drive StationP.O. Box 061080Chicago, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Over-the-air, satellite and cable transmission of audio and video material; broadband communication services, namely, satellite, cable, network transmission of sounds, images, signals and dataABANDONEDMay 26, 2008
041Entertainment services, namely, production of television programs, scheduling of movies and television programming and distribution of movies and television programs for others; production of interstitials, namely, short programs for broadcast on television and online, and short television programs, namely, on-air spotsABANDONEDMay 26, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2010CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Apr 5, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2010MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 5, 2010ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 2, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 26, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 13, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance