USPTO serial 77607981
FLYING TIGRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLYING TIGRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica B. Richman
Monica B. Richman Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLPWacker Drive StationP.O. Box 061080Chicago, IL 60606-1080Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Over-the-air, satellite and cable transmission of audio and video material; broadband communication services, namely, satellite, cable, network transmission of sounds, images, signals and data | ABANDONED | May 26, 2008 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, production of television programs, scheduling of movies and television programming and distribution of movies and television programs for others; production of interstitials, namely, short programs for broadcast on television and online, and short television programs, namely, on-air spots | ABANDONED | May 26, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lifetime Entertainment Services
- Other trademarks owned by LIFETIME ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LIFETIME ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named FLYING TIGRESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2010 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |