Drawing for ARIANA NETWORK SERVICE

USPTO serial 77608110

ARIANA NETWORK SERVICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ARIANA NETWORK SERVICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen J. Jeffries

Stephen J. Jeffries Holland & Knight LLP800 17th Street NWSuite 1100Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) services; transmission of data by telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, and the Internet; dedicated and shared Internet bandwidth services, namely, Internet services provider (ISP) servicesABANDONED—
042Hosting of web sites; CPE maintenance, namely, WIMAX and related internet service, namely, maintenance of computer software used for world wide interoperability of microwave access for computer networks; co-location services, namely, providing facilities for the location of computer servers with the equipment of othersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2011MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 10, 2011ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 10, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 10, 2011OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 20, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 28, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2010ISTBWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE-TTAB REQUEST—
Mar 23, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 1, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 1, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 25, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 11, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 10, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance