USPTO serial 77608195
OILFIELD-ELECTRIC-MARINE, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OILFIELD-ELECTRIC-MARINE, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC412 MAIN STREET, 7TH FLOORHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Variable frequency drives for large power applications in the oil and gas, metal, marine and other industries; alternating current motor starters; alternating current servo motors for machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electrical distribution and control systems for AC and DC motors used in the oil and gas, marine boat and barge, mining, dredging and petrochemical industries, namely, switchgear, variable frequency drives, SCR-DC motor controllers, AC motor starters, unit substations, AC motors, control rooms and enclosures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 5, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |