USPTO serial 77608486
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph J. Corso
DAVID R POSTERARO KOHRMAN JACKSON & KRANTZ PLLONE CLEVELAND CENTER20TH FLOORCLEVELAND, OH 44114-1793| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Mail order catalog services, computerized on-line ordering services and direct response retail services by means of print advertisements in the fields of clothing, clothing accessories, footwear, women's sleepwear, women's undergarments, brassieres, bathrobes, and hose | ABANDONED | Oct 6, 2008 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |