Drawing for CHECKINHAND.COM

USPTO serial 77608786

CHECKINHAND.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHECKINHAND.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Antoinette M. Tease

ANTOINETTE M. TEASE ANTOINETTE M. TEASE, P.L.L.C.PO BOX 51016BILLINGS, MT 59105-1016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Web-based business management services for new and used automobile dealers, including management of marketing and advertising budgets, distribution of customer sales leads, and development of advertising campaigns using web designs that are tailored to the requirements of certain finance departmentsACTIVE—
036Provision of credit bureau information in the nature of credit inquiries and evaluation of credit bureau data; provision of automobile wholesale and retail valuation informationACTIVE—
042Application service provider featuring software for the preparation and submission of finance applications for the purchase of new and used automobilesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 7, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 27, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 27, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 25, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 18, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 11, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 11, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 10, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance