CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for OXYBLOOM

USPTO serial 77608928

OXYBLOOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3956405Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 10, 2011
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with OXYBLOOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christina M. Licursi

Christina M. Licursi WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVENUEBOSTON, MA 02210-2206UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus, namely, a water processing unit having a water inlet, a gas diffuser housed in the unit for mixing gas with inflowing water, a gas diffusion chamber and a water discharge outlet for use in spraying of plant root systems and greenerySECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2017C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Oct 25, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 27, 2017EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Mar 7, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 10, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 22, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 2, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 14, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 24, 2010MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 21, 2010RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 22, 2010PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 21, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 18, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2010CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 20, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 15, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 11, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 10, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 13, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 11, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 10, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance