USPTO serial 77608983
PHY-MONGSHE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHY-MONGSHE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yoon S. Ham
YOON S. HAM LOWE HAUPTMAN HAM & BERNER LLP1700 DIAGONAL ROADSUITE 300ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, Cosmetics for dry skin, Perfume of flower's extract, Lipsticks, Body lotion, Perfume, Hair gel, Soap, Dentifrices, Shampoos, Rose oil for cosmetic purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |