USPTO serial 77609170
AVESTHAGEN BRINGING SCIENCE TO LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AVESTHAGEN BRINGING SCIENCE TO LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bangalore, Karnataka, IN
Bangalore, Karnataka, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Larson
James A. Larson Hamre, Schumann, Mueller & Larson, P.C.P.O. Box 2902Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | scientific research for others, namely, the testing, screening and analysis of pharmaceuticals and biological substances | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |