USPTO serial 77610208
BUDGET MAESTRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4336618Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 21, 2013
- Examiner
- OLANDRIA, WARREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BUDGET MAESTRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEWIS F. GOULD, JR.
LEWIS F. GOULD, JR. DUANE MORRIS LLP30 SOUTH 17TH STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for budgeting, forecasting, consolidation of financial data and financial reporting, for use in financial reporting or analysis, excluding from all of the foregoing, computer software for use in connection with debit and bank card services, financial settlement and authorization services relating to payment card transactions, verification of financial information, payer authorizing services, electronic funds transfer and currency exchange services, transaction authorization and settlement services, magnetically encoded bank, debit, credit and payment cards, stored value cards, prepaid cards, telephone calling cards, ATM services, ATM cards, letter of credit issuance services, electronic settlement services, and company credit investigation services, magnetic data carriers, and further excluding computer software for transmitting, displaying and storing transaction, identification and financial information for use in the financial services, banking and telecommunications industries | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 17, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 21, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 21, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2013 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |