Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77610594?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77610594. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns 32 THIRTY-TWO STEAK & SEAFOOD?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77610594, the listed owner(s) include: Imperial Palace of Mississippi, LLC.

What is USPTO serial number 77610594?

Serial number 77610594 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark 32 THIRTY-TWO STEAK & SEAFOOD. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of 32 THIRTY-TWO STEAK & SEAFOOD?

32 THIRTY-TWO STEAK & SEAFOOD (77610594) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover 32 THIRTY-TWO STEAK & SEAFOOD?

The public record lists International Classes: 043. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77610594

32 THIRTY-TWO STEAK & SEAFOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Nov 9, 2008
Status date: Mar 28, 2011
Registration date: —
Examiner: SHARMA, NAPOLEON
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 32 THIRTY-TWO STEAK & SEAFOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Imperial Palace of Mississippi, LLC
Biloxi, NV
Other trademarks owned by Imperial Palace of Mississippi, LLC

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael Bruffey

ASHLEY E NITZ NITZ WALTON & HEATON LTD601 SOUTH TENTH STREETSUITE 201LAS VEGAS, NV 89101

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
043	Bar and restaurant services; Cocktail lounges; Hotel, bar and restaurant services; Hotel, restaurant and bar services; Reservation of restaurants; Restaurant; Restaurant and bar services; Restaurant services; Restaurants; Sommelier services, namely, providing advice on wine and wine and food pairing; Wine bars	ACTIVE	Dec 22, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 18, 2011	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Mar 28, 2011	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Mar 25, 2011	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Mar 25, 2011	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Feb 8, 2011	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Sep 29, 2010	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2010	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Sep 9, 2010	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Aug 27, 2010	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Aug 27, 2010	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2010	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Aug 27, 2010	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Jun 28, 2010	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 28, 2010	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 12, 2009	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Nov 12, 2009	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 2009	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 26, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 26, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2009	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Oct 26, 2009	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Aug 24, 2009	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 24, 2009	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 11, 2009	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2009	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2009	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Nov 13, 2008	MDSM	NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED	—
Nov 12, 2008	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—