USPTO serial 77610794
LUMIELINA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUMIELINA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, JP
Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A. Pelletier, Jr.
George A. Pelletier, Jr. Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps, namely, soaps for baths, soaps for beauty care, liquid soaps, toilet soaps; hair shampoos; hair rinses; fragrances, namely, eau de colognes, perfumes, lavender oils, clove oils; cosmetics, namely, hair gels, massage gels, milk lotions for the skin, skin lotions, hair lotions, body lotions, shaving lotions, vanishing creams, cleansing creams, hair creams, non-medicated scurf creams, toilet oils, massage oils, bath oils, sun oils, baby oils, beauty mask packs for the face, skin, body and hair, lip conditioners, hair conditioners, skin fresheners, non-medicated hair treatment for cosmetic purposes, suntan milks, suntan creams, suntan lotions, sun screen lotions, sun screen creams, hand creams, talcum powders, bath powders, baby powders, hair sprays, hair tonics, hair mousse; bath salts; and bath extracts and bath essences, namely, non-medicated bath preparations in the nature of bath flakes, bath beads, bath foams, bath gels, and liquid bath soaps that enhance relaxation and promote skin and body care | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Hairdressing; beauty salon services and aesthetic salon services featuring beauty treatments; beauty salon services and aesthetic salon services; consultation relating to hairdressing, beauty treatments, beauty salon services and aesthetic salon services; providing information on hairdressing, beauty treatments, beauty salon services and aesthetic salon services; massage and acupressure; moxa cautery, namely, moxibustion; reposition in judo, namely, treatment to joint-dislocation, sprain, bone-fracture or the like (judo-seifuku); and acupuncture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Lumielina
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Lumielina
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named LUMIELINA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |