USPTO serial 77611120
WECOMM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WECOMM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Austin Friars, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie Nichols Matthews
JULIE NICHOLS MATTHEWS WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP225 W WACKER DR STE 2800CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software to enable the broadcast of streaming real-time data via wireless communication networks; computer software to enable access to information databases; computer software and telecommunications apparatus to enable connection to databases and the Internet; computer software for satellite navigation, mobile telephones, electronic personal digital assistants and portable electronic media and gaming devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications; communication services; broadcasting services; provision of access to information databases; broadcasting of information and data via wireless communication systems; consultancy, information and advice on the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of computer software to enable the broadcast of streaming real-time data via wireless communication networks, computer software to enable access to information databases, computer software and telecommunications apparatus to enable connection to databases and the Internet, computer software for satellite navigation, mobile telephones, electronic personal digital assistants and portable electronic media and gaming devices; computer programming services; consultancy, information and advice on the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |