USPTO serial 77612156
COLONWATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLONWATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richmond Hill Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
ANDREW S. EHARD MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer storage media, namely, computer tapes, computer discs and CD-ROMs, providing genomic, proteomic and gene expression profile information for use in selecting therapeutics, evaluating efficacy and toxicity of treatments, evaluating treatment progression, prognosing disease or disease progression, and identifying disease heredity risk factors | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical diagnostic services, namely, diagnosing, preventing and predicting disease, identifying risk factors of disease, prognostic testing, gene and protein testing, identifying physiological characteristics, and evaluating efficacy of treatment; medical diagnostic services, namely, establishing individual preventative care programs, establishing disease treatment based on gene and protein expression and activity, evaluating clinical trial progress, and drug monitoring and monitoring of patient health progression; providing genomic, proteomic and gene expression profiles useful in selecting therapeutics, evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of treatments and evaluating treatment progression, prognosing disease or disease progression and identifying disease heredity risk factors; computer services, namely, computer tracking of and providing access to databases of life sciences information via global, national and local computer networks in the field of pharmacogenomics, diagnostics, personalized medicine and toxicogenomics; providing a website for patients and medical professionals featuring educational information about personalized health management, disease, and disease risk assessment services and screening products, and maintaining and providing access to a patient registry containing personalized health management information accessible via global, national and local computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |