USPTO serial 77612244
TIGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TIGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BengBu, AnHui Province, CN
BengBu, AnHui Province, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald C. Lucas
DONALD C. LUCAS LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP475 PARK AVE SNEW YORK, NY 10016-6901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Nutritional additives for animal foodstuffs, not for medical purposes; animal foodstuffs, namely, grains for animal consumption; stall food for animals; beverage for animals; livestock feed, namely, cattle feed; stall food for animals, namely, livestock; pet feed, namely, pet food, pet treats; beverages for pets | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |