Drawing for AERUS

USPTO serial 77613375

AERUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AERUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sophie B. Anger

SOPHIE B. ANGER SCHERING CORPORATION2000 GALLOPING HILL ROADK-6-1 M1030KENILWORTH, NJ 07033-0530

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Antihistamine, anti-allergy, anti-inflammatory, and cough and cold preparations, and nasal decongestantABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2010MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION
Nov 23, 2010ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Nov 15, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Oct 18, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 5, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 29, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 27, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jul 27, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 25, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 25, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 25, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 25, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 1, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 1, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 22, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 17, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance