USPTO serial 77615387
GOLF TO IMPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 7, 2010
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GOLF TO IMPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Las Vegas, NV
North Las Vegas, NV
North Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Omar A. Siddiqui, Esq.
OMAR A. SIDDIQUI, ESQ. ULWELLING SIDDIQUI LLP695 TOWN CENTER DR STE 700COSTA MESA, CA 92626-7187UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, jackets, vests, pants, shorts, hats, caps, shoes, sports shoes, namely, cleats, socks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2008 |
| 028 | Golf clubs, golf tees, golf ball markers, golf club head covers, golf bag tags, golf towel clips for attachment to golf bags, golf bags, golf ball sleeves, golf tee holder | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2008 |
| 035 | Computerized on-line ordering services featuring golf merchandise and related accessories | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2005 |
| 041 | Providing on-line information about golf via the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2005 |
| 042 | Hosting an on-line website featuring sales and information of golf products and related sporting merchandise and accessories | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pierson, Christopher
- Other trademarks owned by Pierson, Christopher
- Other trademarks owned by Pierson, Christopher
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GOLF TO IMPRESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |