Drawing for INTELLIDRIVE

USPTO serial 77616816

INTELLIDRIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLIDRIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott Warner

Robert M. Kern II Research and Innovative Technology Admin1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEE35-333Washington, DC 20590

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business services, namely, facilities management of technical operationsACTIVE—
038Computer-aided transmission of information and images for use in determining the location and position of vehicles, vessels and trains, and for use in allowing for rapid communication to the driver or operator of safety and hazard alerts and messages; telecommunications services, namely, transmission of voice, data and documents, in the field of search and rescue operations relating to road vehicle, sea vessel, and railway accidents; telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics, images, audio and video by means of wireless communication networksACTIVE—
039Providing road traffic information services; vehicle routing by computer on data networks; providing a web site and web site links to geographic information, map images, and trip routingACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of on-line, non-downloadable software for global positioning and providing geographic location informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 8, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 8, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 1, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 1, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 1, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 1, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 31, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 31, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 21, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2008MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 21, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance