Drawing for VIKING

USPTO serial 77616841

VIKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLLIER, DAVID E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eamon J. Wall

EAMON J. WALL WALL & TONG, LLP595 SHREWSBURY AVENUESUITE 100SHREWSBURY, NJ 07702

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030BAKED GOODS, NAMELY, CAKESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 22, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 21, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 10, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 9, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 7, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 4, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 4, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 4, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 4, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 16, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 16, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 15, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 16, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 16, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance