USPTO serial 77617686
M. GALIANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M. GALIANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B.G. Horowitz, Esq.
ROBERT B.G. HOROWITZ, ESQ. BAKER & HOSTETLER, LLP45 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10111-0100UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin, eye and lip care products, namely, an anti-aging skin cream, an eye rejuvenating cream, a lip rejuvenating cream and a facial cleanser | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2010 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |