USPTO serial 77618202
KREEPSVILLE 666
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3794183Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 25, 2010
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KREEPSVILLE 666?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
aberdeen, GB
aberdeen, GB
aberdeen, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Body-piercing rings; Bracelets; Bracelets of precious metal; Ear clips; Ear studs; Earrings; Necklaces; Rings (based on 44(e)) Costume jewelry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 10, 2009 |
| 018 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Canvas shopping bags; Clutch bags; Cosmetic bags sold empty; Textile shopping bags; Wallet chains; (based on 44(e)) Backpacks, book bags, sports bags, bum bags, wallets and handbags; Handbags, purses and wallets; Leather bags and wallets; Messenger bags; Overnight bags; Purses and wallets; School book bags; Wallets; Wallets made of leather or other materials; Wallets with card compartments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 9, 2006 |
| 020 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Personal compact mirrors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 9, 2008 |
| 025 | (Based on 44(e)) Ankle socks; Belts; Caps; Children's and infants' cloth bibs; Children's cloth eating bibs; Cloth bibs; Clothing, namely, arm warmers; Infant and toddler one piece clothing; Leather belts; Men's socks; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; Skirts; Skirts and dresses; Socks; Socks and stockings; T-shirts; Tops; Vests; Wearable garments and clothing, namely, shirts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 8, 2007 |
| 026 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Brooches; Hair accessories, namely, claw clips; Hair accessories, namely, jaw clips; Hair accessories, namely, snap clips; Hair accessories, namely, twisters; Hair bands; Hair barrettes; Hair bows; Hair buckles; Hair chopsticks; Hair clamps; Hair clips; Hair coloring caps; Hair coloring foils; Hair curl clips; Hair ornaments; Hair ornaments in the form of combs; Hair pins; Hair scrunchies; Hair slides; (based on 44(e)) Belt buckles; Belt buckles not of precious metal; Buckles for clothing; Cloth patches for clothing; Embroidered patches for clothing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 5, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RIPPER MERCHANDISE LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ripper merchandise ltd
- Other trademarks owned by ripper merchandise ltd
- Other trademarks owned by ripper merchandise ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named KREEPSVILLE 666
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 25, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |