USPTO serial 77618719
HUMBLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MITTLER, ROBIN M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HUMBLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathan E. Ferguson
Nathan E. Ferguson WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL ROADPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Beauty aids, namely, skin creams and skin lotions intended to promote the healthy functioning and appearance of the face and body | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit-based and vegetable-based beverages in non-carbonated, carbonated and smoothie forms; non-alcoholic water-based beverages in non-carbonated and carbonated forms, namely, flavored waters, soda pop, fruit punch and lemonade; non-alcoholic fruit-based beverages, namely, smoothies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 16, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 27, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |