USPTO serial 77618873
COMBO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMBO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
68305 Mannheim, DE
68305 Mannheim, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Michael Young
D. MICHAEL YOUNG ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS OPERATIONS, INC.9115 HAGUE ROADINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46256UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | in vitro diagnostics for medical purposes, namely, test strips for the detection of blood glucose | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | blood glucose meters; lancet devices and lancets for medical purpose; insulin pumps and infusion sets | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | medical services for others in the field of diabetes; data management services for others in the field of diabetes, namely, provision of information in the field of diabetes via the internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Roche Diagnostics GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Roche Diagnostics GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named COMBO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 27, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |