USPTO serial 77619334
LEILANI BISHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEILANI BISHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Akua Boyenne
468 N CAMDEN DR # 200BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210-4507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | After shave lotions; Antibacterial soap; Antiperspirants and deodorants for personal use; Aromatherapy creams; Aromatherapy lotions; Aromatherapy oils; Astringents for cosmetic purposes; Bath oils and bath salts; Bath soaps; Blush; Body creams; Body deodorants; Body lotions; Body mask cream; Body mask lotion; Body mask powder; Body masks; Body oils; Body powder; Body scrub; Body splash; Colognes, perfumes and cosmetics; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic soaps; Cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; Cosmetics and make-up; Dental bleaching gel; Deodorant soap; Deodorants and antiperspirants for personal use; Eau de cologne; Eau de perfume; Eau de toilette; Essential oils for personal use; Eye liner; Eye lotions; Eye make-up; Eye make-up remover; Eye pencils; Eye shadow; Face and body creams; Face powder; Facial creams; Facial emulsions; Facial lotion; Facial make-up; Facial masks; Facial scrubs; Foundation make-up; Fragrances and perfumery; Hair care creams; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair emollients; Hair gel and hair mousse; Hair lotion; Hair oils; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hair sprays and hair gels; Hair tonics; Hand cream; Hand creams; Hand lotions; Hand scrubs; Hand soaps; Lip balm; Lip gloss; Lip liner; Lipstick; Lipstick cases; Lipstick holders; Lipsticks; Lotions for cosmetic purposes; Make up foundations; Make-up; Make-up pencils; Make-up powder; Make-up remover; Mascaras; Massage creams; Massage oil; Moisturizing creams; Non-medicated dental rinse; Oil baths for hair care; Oils for perfumes and scents; Pencils for cosmetic purposes; Perfume oils; Perfumed powders; Perfumed soaps; Perfumes, aftershaves and colognes; Pressed face powder; Rouges; Scented body lotions and creams; Scented body spray; Shaving creams; Shaving foam; Shaving gels; Shaving lotions; Shaving soaps; Shower and bath foam; Shower and bath gel; Shower creams; Shower gels; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Skin cleansers; Skin conditioners; Skin creams; Skin lotions; Skin soap; Skin toners; Toilet soap; Tooth paste; Tooth polish; Tooth powders; Topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 1, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |