Drawing for LET'S BE CLEAR

USPTO serial 77619788

LET'S BE CLEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LET'S BE CLEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marshall J. Nelson

MARSHALL J. NELSON DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 2200SEATTLE, WA 98101-3045UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing career information via computer networks; Providing information via computer networks in the field of shopping and auctionsACTIVE—
036Providing information via computer networks in the field of finance and investingACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; electronic, electric, and digital transmission of data, images, signals, messages and voice; providing high speed access to area networks and a global computer information network; telecommunication consultation; providing high speed access to computer and communication networks; providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest; providing e-mail and instant messaging servicesACTIVE—
039Providing information via computer networks in the field of travelACTIVE—
041Providing information via computer networks in the fields of entertainment, namely, movies, television, music, sports, celebrity personalities, current events, theater, education, movie schedule and movie location information services; providing a website featuring information, listings, and news regarding television programming and entertainment; providing information relating to electronic and computer games; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, celebrity interviews, talk shows, television show previews, photographs, and film clips featuring performers and celebrities; providing prerecorded music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all via computer networksACTIVE—
042Providing information via computer networks in the field of weather, computer technology and scienceACTIVE—
044Providing information via computer networks in the field of healthACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 29, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 21, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 21, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 2, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 27, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 4, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 15, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 26, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 25, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 4, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 24, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 26, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 25, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance