USPTO serial 77620532
XDT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XDT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE H. SALES
BRUCE H. SALES LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK, LLP600 SOUTH AVENUE WESTWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES AND MACHINE TOOLS, namely, COMPUTER NUMERICALLY CONTROLLED (CNC) LATHES AND MACHINING CENTERS; DRILLING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, ROTARY ROLLER REAMERS USED FOR MAINTAINING WELL BORE GAUGE, TORQUE REDUCTION, REDUCING DOWN HOLE VIBRATION IN DRILL STRING, UNDER REAMERS AND INTEGRAL BLADE STABILIZERS AND PARTS THEREFOR, DOWN HOLE ROTARY DRILLING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, EQUIPMENT USED FOR MAINTAINING WELL BORE GAUGE SIZE AND STABILIZING THE DRILL STRING; REAMERS, NAMELY, REAMERS FOR USE IN ROTARY DRILLING OPERATIONS; ROLLER CARTRIDGES, NAMELY, ONE-PIECE SEAL BEARING CARTRIDGES FOR USE IN ROTARY ROLLER REAMERS; RETENTION ARRANGEMENTS, NAMELY, TAPERED SYSTEMS ON UPPER AND LOWER RETENTION CUSPS THAT LOCK THE CARTRIDGE INTO THE REAMER BODY, AND SYSTEMS FOR ROLLER CARTRIDGES, INCLUDING FOR ROLLER CARTRIDGES IN ROTARY ROLLER REAMERS COMPRISED OF UPPER AND LOWER CUSPS, CRUSHING ROLLERS AND A CRUSHING ROLLER PIN; STABILIZERS USED FOR STABILIZING THE DRILL STRING (BOTTOM HOLE ASSEMBLY) FOR TOP DRIVE OR ROTARY DRILLING OPERATIONS; SURFACE EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, PRESSURE CONTAINING EQUIPMENT AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT FOR THE CASING STRINGS AND PRODUCTION TUBING FOR THE OIL AND GAS FIELD DRILLING INDUSTRIES; WELLHEAD EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, CASING HEADS, CASING SPOOLS, TUBING HEADS AND CHRISTMAS TREE CAP ASSEMBLIES; WIRELINE EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, EQUIPMENT FOR WELL INTERVENTION AND REMEDIATION OPERATIONS CONDUCTED USING A SINGLE-STRAND OR MULTISTRAND WIRE OR CABLE FOR OIL AND GAS WELLS; HANDLING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, DRILL COLLARS, DRILL PIPE ELEVATORS, PICK UP SUBS EQUIPMENT USED FOR HANDLING BOTTOM HOLE ASSEMBLY AND THE DRILL STRING FOR THE OIL AND GAS FIELD INDUSTRIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | RENTAL AND REPAIR OF MACHINES AND MACHINE TOOLS USED IN THE OIL AND GAS FIELD DRILLING INDUSTRIES; RENTAL AND REPAIR OF DRILLING EQUIPMENT AND PARTS THEREFOR; RENTAL AND REPAIR OF DOWN-HOLE ROTARY DRILLING EQUIPMENT AND REAMERS, INCLUDING REAMERS FOR USE IN ROTARY DRILLING OPERATIONS; RENTAL AND REPAIR OF ROLLER CARTRIDGES FOR USE IN ROTARY ROLLER REAMERS; RENTAL AND REPAIR OF RETENTION ARRANGEMENTS AND SYSTEMS FOR ROLLER CARTRIDGES, INCLUDING FOR ROTARY CARTRIDGES IN ROTARY ROLLER REAMERS; RENTAL AND REPAIR OF STABILIZERS FOR ROTARY DRILLING OPERATIONS; RENTAL AND REPAIR OF SURFACE EQUIPMENT FOR THE OIL AND GAS FIELD DRILLING INDUSTRIES; RENTAL AND REPAIR OF CASING AND TUBING USED IN THE OIL AND GAS FIELD DRILLING INDUSTRIES; RENTAL AND REPAIR OF WELLHEAD EQUIPMENT, DRILLING EQUIPMENT, WIRELINE EQUIPMENT AND HANDLING EQUIPMENT ALL FOR THE OIL AND GAS FIELD DRILLING INDUSTRIES; METAL MACHINING SERVICES, NAMELY, REPAIR OF ROTARY SHOULDERED CONNECTIONS AND ANY OTHER SPECIFIED CONNECTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Extreme Machining Australia Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Extreme Machining Australia Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named XDT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 9, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |