USPTO serial 77621001
CRÈMEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3931559Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 15, 2011
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CRÈMEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OAK BROOK, IL
Westchester, IL
Westchester, IL
Westchester, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
jo osborn
Jo E. Osborn TreeHouse Foods, Inc.2021 Spring RoadOak Brook, IL 60523-1813UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Non-dairy creamer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TREEHOUSE FOODS, IINC.
- Other trademarks owned by THF Equities, LP
- Other trademarks owned by THF Equities, LP
- Other trademarks owned by THF Equities, LP
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named CRÈMEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 5, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |