Drawing for CLEAR

USPTO serial 77622802

CLEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marshall J. Nelson

MARSHALL J NELSON DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUESUITE 2200SEATTLE, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing career information via computer networks; Providing information via computer networks in the fields of news and entertainment, namely, auctionsACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; electronic, electric, and digital transmission of data, images, signals, messages and voice; providing high speed access to area networks and a global computer information network; telecommunication consultation; providing high speed access to computer and communication networks; providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest; providing email and instant messaging servicesACTIVE—
039Providing information via computer networks in the field of travelACTIVE—
041Providing information via computer networks in the fields of news and entertainment, namely, movies, television programs, music, sports, celebrity personalities, current events, shopping, health education; movie schedule and location information services; providing information and entertainment via computer networks in the field of horoscopes; providing a web site featuring television programming information, listings, and news and entertainment; providing information relating to electronic and computer games; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, news film clips, celebrity interviews, talk shows, television program previews, photographs; providing prerecorded music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all via computer networksACTIVE—
044Providing information via computer networks in the field of healthcareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 18, 2011TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Feb 18, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 18, 2011OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Dec 22, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 21, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 19, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 9, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 2, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 12, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 10, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 10, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 7, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 10, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 19, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 8, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 24, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 1, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance