USPTO serial 77623612
EGRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4720417Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 14, 2015
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EGRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Niederrohrdorf, CH
Niederrohrdorf, CH
Niederrohrdorf, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. English
Robert J. English COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.114 West 47th StreetNEW YORK, NY 10036-5225UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | INTERRUPTER SHIELDS, namely, METAL TUBES; [ METAL CABLE ARMOUR AND LAGGING FOR HIGH VOLTAGE CURRENT GENERATORS AND THE ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY; ] METAL CANS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 25, 2002 |
| 009 | CONTACT CROWNS, NAMELY, CIRCUIT BREAKERS AND CIRCUIT CLOSERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 25, 2002 |
| 021 | [ APPLIANCES, namely, CHEESE GRATERS, POTATO RASPS, namely, POTATO GRATERS, BIRCHER MUESLI RASPS, namely, BIRCHER MUESLI GRATERS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 25, 2002 |
| 034 | [ ASHTRAYS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 25, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Visionova Management AG
- Other trademarks owned by Visionova Management AG
- Other trademarks owned by Visionova Management AG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Similar marks named EGRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 14, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2021 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 3, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 19, 2011 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |